Current:Home > ContactColorado plans to relocate wolf pack as reintroduction effort stumbles amid livestock attacks -ProgressCapital
Colorado plans to relocate wolf pack as reintroduction effort stumbles amid livestock attacks
View
Date:2025-04-19 02:16:31
Wildlife agencies are trying to capture and relocate the first pack of wolves that formed under Colorado’s ambitious wolf reintroduction program after the animals repeatedly attacked livestock, marking an early stumble in the first year of the voter-driven initiative.
The move comes only a week after state officials touted three pups born to the Copper Creek pack, which formed after 10 of the predators were released in December over bitter opposition from livestock groups. The pack has at least two adults.
The bid to capture them goes against the state’s wolf management plan. That 2023 document includes guidance that a relocation “has little technical merit” because it could create problems elsewhere if the animals continue attacking livestock.
Officials did not say where the Copper Creek pack would be relocated.
Ranching groups wanted the wolf pack killed. Wildlife advocates said more should have been done to keep them from killing livestock, such as using electric fencing that can better deters attacks.
In other parts of the U.S. where wolves are well-established — including in the Northern U.S. Rocky Mountains and around the Great Lakes — the predators are routinely killed by wildlife officials in response to livestock attacks. Wolves are prolific breeders so removing some animals doesn’t have population-wide effects.
Colorado’s attempt to instead capture problem wolves comes after an agency spokesperson told The Associated Press last week that officials wanted to avoid killing them because “it’s too early in the process” of reintroduction.
“We don’t have enough wolves on the landscape to lethally remove” the pack, spokesperson Travis Duncan said.
State officials did not disclose where the capture operations were taking place but said the work was being done in conjunction with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Michael Saul with Defenders of Wildlife said it was a “big setback” for the reintroduction.
“There are lots of ranchers using existing tools who are living with wolves and not having this problem,” Saul said.
In a statement issued late Tuesday, Colorado Parks and Wildlife Director Jeff Davis characterized the Copper Creek pack relocation as a “unique case,” but did not elaborate.
“This action is by no means a precedent for how CPW will resolve wolf-livestock conflict moving forward,” Davis said in the statement. “The ultimate goal of the operation is to relocate the pack to another location while we assess our best options for them to continue to contribute to the successful restoration of wolves in Colorado.”
Wolf reintroduction in Colorado was narrowly approved by voters in a 2020 ballot measure. Wildlife officials expect to release an additional 30 to 50 wolves over the coming years. A handful of wolves have also wandered into Colorado from Wyoming.
Proponents argued that the apex predators would reestablish an ecological balance in the area. Wolves were largely hunted out of the state by the 1940s.
Owners of calves that are killed can be compensated by the state for the animal’s market value, up to $15,000. Ranchers have said that’s not enough.
Gray wolves killed some 800 domesticated animals across 10 states in 2022, including Colorado, according to a previous Associated Press review of depredation data from state and federal agencies. While the losses can affect individual ranchers, it has a negligible effect on the industry at large.
veryGood! (6184)
Related
- NCAA hits former Michigan coach Jim Harbaugh with suspension, show-cause for recruiting violations
- Illinois man wrongly imprisoned for murder wins $50 million jury award
- 1 Day Left! Extra 25% Off Nordstrom Clearance + Up to 74% Off Madewell, Free People, Good American & More
- MTV VMAs: Riskiest Fashion Moments of All Time
- Scoot flight from Singapore to Wuhan turns back after 'technical issue' detected
- Surprise! New 70% Off Styles Added to the Lilly Pulitzer Sunshine Sale—Hurry, They’re Selling Out Fast
- NFL Week 1 overreactions: Can Jets figure it out? Browns, Bengals in trouble
- Deshaun Watson, Daniel Jones among four quarterbacks under most pressure after Week 1
- Messi injury update: Ankle 'better every day' but Inter Miami star yet to play Leagues Cup
- Chipotle uses memes for inspiration in first-ever costume line with Spirit Halloween
Ranking
- Chief beer officer for Yard House: A side gig that comes with a daily swig.
- Kyle Larson expected to return to Indianapolis 500 for another shot at ‘The Double’ in 2025
- Unionized Workers Making EV Batteries Downplay Politics of the Product
- Watch Louisiana tower turn into dust as city demolishes building ravaged by hurricanes
- Behind on your annual reading goal? Books under 200 pages to read before 2024 ends
- Video captures big black bear's casual stroll across crowded California beach
- 'Scared everywhere': Apalachee survivors grapple with school shooting's toll
- James Earl Jones, acclaimed actor and voice of Darth Vader, dies at 93
Recommendation
Michigan lawmaker who was arrested in June loses reelection bid in Republican primary
Black Eyed Peas to debut AI member inspired by 'empress' Taylor Swift at Vegas residency
When does 'The Voice' start? Season 26 date, time and Snoop Dogg's coaching debut
Johnny Gaudreau's wife reveals pregnancy with 3rd child at emotional double funeral
Krispy Kreme offers a free dozen Grinch green doughnuts: When to get the deal
‘I won’t let them drink the water’: The California towns where clean drinking water is out of reach
Bachelorette’s Jenn Tran and Jonathon Johnson Address Relationship Speculation
Lala Kent Reveals Name of Baby No. 2